Court: Court of Protection
Case No: COP20003709
Neutral Citation: [2024] EWCOP 65 (T3)
Date: 31st October 2024
Judge: The Honourable Mr Justice Hayden

Parties Involved

• Applicant: Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust
• Respondents:
  1. CC (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
  2. F
  3. M

Representation

• Applicant: Adam Fullwood (instructed by Bevan Brittan LLP)
• First Respondent (CC): Fiona Paterson KC (instructed by the Official Solicitor)
• Second and Third Respondents (F and M): Represented themselves

Hearing Dates

• 30th and 31st October 2024

Key Facts

The case involves the Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust seeking to make a decision about the mental capacity of the respondents. The case likely concerns issues of mental health and the ability of the individuals (CC, F, and M) to make decisions regarding their care, treatment, or other personal matters. Given the involvement of the Official Solicitor, the first respondent (CC) may be subject to a litigation process where a legal guardian or representative is appointed to act in her best interests.

Legal Issues

• Mental Capacity:
  The main legal issue in this case is the determination of the respondents’ mental capacity, which could involve decisions about medical treatment, living arrangements, or the ability to make personal decisions.
• Care and Treatment Decisions:
  The applicant (NHS Trust) is seeking legal authorization for specific actions or treatment options in light of the respondents’ mental health conditions, ensuring that decisions align with their best interests and the legal requirements under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Observations

The case illustrates the intersection of mental health law, personal care, and the rights of individuals under the Mental Capacity Act. The presence of the Official Solicitor suggests concerns about ensuring that the first respondent (CC) is fairly represented in the proceedings. The involvement of the NHS Trust indicates that the matter may concern specific care or treatment decisions, which may involve significant medical or legal intervention.

Decision

As of the last available information, the court’s decision on the matter had not been disclosed, but the hearing is focused on ensuring that the rights of the respondents are safeguarded in the decision-making process regarding their care and treatment. The judgment will likely determine how their mental capacity impacts those decisions and what steps will be taken in their best interests.

• Download Barnet-Enfield-and-Haringey-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust-v-CC-and-others-1.pdffile
• Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust -v- CC and others 444.28 kb