SRIHARI HANUMANDAS TOTALA VS. HEMANT VITHAL KAMAT & ORS. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4665 OF 2021] DR JUSTICE DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AUGUST 9, 2021 LAW POINTS Whether a Suit is barred by law, must be determined from the statements in the…
VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS. [REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO. 18447 OF 2020] DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J 9TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- In accordance with Rule 2 of Order…
Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2876 OF 2021] SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 19th JULY 2021 LAW POINT- A bank guarantee is an independent contact, there is a limited scope for interference, in case…
Sayyed Ayaz Ali Vs. Prakash G. Goyal & Ors. [CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2401-2402 OF 2021] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J 20TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- Where the suit appears from the statements in the plaint to be barred by any…
K.P. NATARAJAN & ANR. VS. MUTHALAMMAL & ORS. [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2021] V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 16TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- The failure to appoint guardian ipso facto, will result in prejudice to the minor and it…
FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE CITATION: CIVIL NO(S). 755/2021 FACTS: The proceeding before the Supreme Court arises out of a commercial dispute between the parties over supply of certain…
COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY : Justices Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Vineet Saran JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 17.02.2021 LAW POINT : Compromise decree would not serve as an estoppel, where…
PADIA TIMBER COMPANY (P) LTD. VERSUS. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 05.01.2021 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY: Justices Navin Sinha and Indira Banerjee LAW POINT: when the acceptor puts in a new condition, while accepting the contract already signed by the…
D & C Builders v. Rees [1966] 2 QB 617, Court of Appeal The plaintiffs, a small building company, carried out building work for the defendant. The defendant paid £250 on account and a balance of £482 13s. 1d. remained…
Foakes v. Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605, House of Lords In August 1875 the respondent, Mrs Beer, obtained a judgment against the appellant, Dr Foakes, for the sum of £2,090 19s. Mrs Beer was entitled to interest on the…